DISA STIG · CIS Benchmarks · NIST 800-53

Security baselines, explained.

Plain-English explanations of DISA STIG and CIS Benchmark controls, mapped to NIST 800-53 — so the person fixing the finding understands it as well as the person who wrote it up.

The problem

01

Written for auditors, not engineers

STIG and CIS findings are phrased for the people reviewing the system, not the people fixing it. The engineer holding the ticket still has to translate it.

02

No view of the overlap

Both standards map to NIST 800-53, but nothing shows you how they overlap. The relationship exists in published mappings and stays buried there.

03

The same box, hardened twice

Teams end up hardening the same box twice against two standards, closing findings that were already covered by work they finished last quarter.

How it works

  1. Step 01

    Import your scan results

    Bring in STIG checklists or CIS assessment output. Findings are parsed, deduplicated, and grouped by the system they belong to.

  2. Step 02

    Get plain-English explanations and remediation

    Each finding gets a readable account of what the rule checks, why it matters, the risk of leaving it open, and a concrete path to fixing it.

  3. Step 03

    See how coverage maps across frameworks

    Findings are tied back to NIST 800-53 and to each other through published mappings, so you can see what a fix already covers — and what it doesn't.

Start with the standard you are already being measured against.

Both explainers read your existing scan output. Nothing to install.